Share this post on:

Lina had the fastest growing Latino population in the country between 1990 and 2000 (Suro Tafoya, 2004). The migration of Latinos to North Carolina represents an emerging trend throughout the Southeast and provides an ideal setting for gaining insight into the Naramycin AMedChemExpress Cycloheximide experiences of Latino youth in the South. As eloquently expressed by one of our study participants, we show how migration can turn an adolescent’s world `upside down,’ and we discover the adaptive strategies that Latino immigrant youth use to turn the world right-side up as they acculturate to life in the U.S. Specifically, we consider how first-generation Latino adolescents characterize their migration and acculturation experiences; how migration affects their normative development; and how they adapt to the challenges of international migration and settlement in a new country.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptTHEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONSThree theoretical frameworks inform our analysis ?cultural-ecological theories of child development, acculturation theory and Sluzki’s stages of migration framework, and Luteolin 7-glucoside manufacturer riskresilience and competence perspectives on positive developmental outcomes. Culturalecological theories provide a framework for understanding the development of children from ethnic minorities and immigrant families (Garcia Coll et al., 1996). These theories argue that the cultures, lifestyles, and developmental outcomes of ethnic minority children reflect adaptive responses to contextual demands in their families, schools, and neighborhoods (Garcia Coll et al., 1996). They reject deficit models which presume that normative development for children in white middle-class families should be the basis for development in non-white ethnic minority families as well. Instead, normative development is understood to vary between cultural groups (Greenfield, 1992). From this perspective, migration can be understood as a process which creates unique contextual demands and reshapes normative development. Defined as the process of cultural exchange that occurs between groups when they come into continuous contact, acculturation and the experiences that comprise acculturation shape the daily lives of immigrant youth (Gonzales, Fabrett, Knight, 2009). Some researchers and policy makers implicitly characterize acculturation as a unidirectional process through which immigrant youth adopt the beliefs and behaviors of the dominant culture. In contrast, our research acknowledges that these youth are not only shaped by their new communities, but also that their presence and actions re-shape their communities. Moreover, they can selectively acculturate to their new homes by picking and choosing the cultural beliefs and behaviors that will promote their well-being and by actively engaging with individuals in their communities to create the resources they need (Portes Rumbaut, 2001).J Adolesc Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 September 7.Ko and PerreiraPageThe use of selective acculturation strategies can help immigrant youth mitigate the stress of moving and adapting to a new environment (i.e. migration and acculturative stress). A modified version of Sluzki’s five stages of migration framework provides a template for understanding sources of stress throughout the migration process and adolescents’ responses to these stressors (Zuniga, 2002). In the first stage, the preparatory stage, youth’s parents make a decision to leave. They may or may no.Lina had the fastest growing Latino population in the country between 1990 and 2000 (Suro Tafoya, 2004). The migration of Latinos to North Carolina represents an emerging trend throughout the Southeast and provides an ideal setting for gaining insight into the experiences of Latino youth in the South. As eloquently expressed by one of our study participants, we show how migration can turn an adolescent’s world `upside down,’ and we discover the adaptive strategies that Latino immigrant youth use to turn the world right-side up as they acculturate to life in the U.S. Specifically, we consider how first-generation Latino adolescents characterize their migration and acculturation experiences; how migration affects their normative development; and how they adapt to the challenges of international migration and settlement in a new country.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptTHEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONSThree theoretical frameworks inform our analysis ?cultural-ecological theories of child development, acculturation theory and Sluzki’s stages of migration framework, and riskresilience and competence perspectives on positive developmental outcomes. Culturalecological theories provide a framework for understanding the development of children from ethnic minorities and immigrant families (Garcia Coll et al., 1996). These theories argue that the cultures, lifestyles, and developmental outcomes of ethnic minority children reflect adaptive responses to contextual demands in their families, schools, and neighborhoods (Garcia Coll et al., 1996). They reject deficit models which presume that normative development for children in white middle-class families should be the basis for development in non-white ethnic minority families as well. Instead, normative development is understood to vary between cultural groups (Greenfield, 1992). From this perspective, migration can be understood as a process which creates unique contextual demands and reshapes normative development. Defined as the process of cultural exchange that occurs between groups when they come into continuous contact, acculturation and the experiences that comprise acculturation shape the daily lives of immigrant youth (Gonzales, Fabrett, Knight, 2009). Some researchers and policy makers implicitly characterize acculturation as a unidirectional process through which immigrant youth adopt the beliefs and behaviors of the dominant culture. In contrast, our research acknowledges that these youth are not only shaped by their new communities, but also that their presence and actions re-shape their communities. Moreover, they can selectively acculturate to their new homes by picking and choosing the cultural beliefs and behaviors that will promote their well-being and by actively engaging with individuals in their communities to create the resources they need (Portes Rumbaut, 2001).J Adolesc Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 September 7.Ko and PerreiraPageThe use of selective acculturation strategies can help immigrant youth mitigate the stress of moving and adapting to a new environment (i.e. migration and acculturative stress). A modified version of Sluzki’s five stages of migration framework provides a template for understanding sources of stress throughout the migration process and adolescents’ responses to these stressors (Zuniga, 2002). In the first stage, the preparatory stage, youth’s parents make a decision to leave. They may or may no.

Share this post on:

Author: Proteasome inhibitor