D oxidative stress[16?8,29,33]. However, all previously published studies have examined the roles of ibpAB in bacterial survival in laboratory cultures devoid of eukaryotic cells, and get PX-478 Therefore have limited relevance to host-microbial interactions in animal systems. In our studies, we present new evidence that ibpAB also attenuate the bactericidal activity of macrophage ROS leading to increased survival of certain clinically-relevant E. coli strains within macrophages. The mechanisms by which ibpAB protect E. coli from ROS are not entirely clear. The ibpAB gene sequences are not similar to those of known E. coli superoxide dismutases or catalase and therefore it is unlikely that IbpAB enzymatically neutralize superoxides and peroxides. MorePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120249 March 23,9 /IbpAB Protect Commensal E. coli against ROSlikely, IbpAB function as intracellular chaperones that bind and sequester or refold proteins that have been damaged by ROS, similar to the mechanisms by which they protect bacterial proteins from heat shock[28]. Indeed, others have shown that recombinant IbpA and IbpB suppress inactivation of E. coli metabolic enzymes by potassium superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in vitro and bind non-native forms of the enzymes[28]. Presumably, similar events occur within the cytoplasm of bacteria exposed to ROS or heat, but this concept remains to be proven. Given that ibpAB protect E. coli proteins from damage by ROS, we hypothesized that E. coli upregulate ibpAB expression in response to ROS. In the present work, we show that ROS induce ibpAB expression in E. coli in lab cultures and macrophage phagolysosomes. Interestingly, while we detected a transient increase in ibpAB expression in E. coli cultures treated with the superoxide generator, paraquat, we did not detect upregulation of ibpAB in E. coli cultures treated with hydrogen peroxide (data not shown). The explanation for this difference is not entirely clear, but could be due to the more reactive and therefore damaging nature of superoxides compared with peroxides. We also hypothesized that RNS, like ROS, might induce ibpAB expression. However, contrary to our hypothesis, we observed increased ibpAB expression in E. coli within Inos-/- macrophages that are deficient in RNS production. This unexpected result could be due to compensatory upregulation of ROS production in Inos-/- macrophages, a phenonmenon that has previously been reported[34]. It is also notable that even in the gp91phox-/macrophages that have impaired ROS production, E. coli ibpAB expression increases over time. Therefore, other factors within macrophages, besides ROS, likely play a role in ibpAB expression. The mechanisms by which ROS cause transcription of ibpAB are unknown. Others have previously shown that the alternative sigma factors 32 and 54 transcribe ibpAB and ibpB, respectively[20]. In addition to heat, other factors have been shown to increase 32 protein levels, including ethanol, hyperosmotic shock, carbon starvation, and alkaline pH. On the other hand, 54 controls expression of SP600125 biological activity several nitrogen-metabolism genes. However, changes in abundance or activity of these alternative sigma factors in response to oxidative stress have not been previously reported. In addition to transcriptional control, IbpAB protein levels are also controlled at the levels of RNA processing, translation, and protein stability. [35,36]. In the present study, we show evidence suggesting that ibpAB expression.D oxidative stress[16?8,29,33]. However, all previously published studies have examined the roles of ibpAB in bacterial survival in laboratory cultures devoid of eukaryotic cells, and therefore have limited relevance to host-microbial interactions in animal systems. In our studies, we present new evidence that ibpAB also attenuate the bactericidal activity of macrophage ROS leading to increased survival of certain clinically-relevant E. coli strains within macrophages. The mechanisms by which ibpAB protect E. coli from ROS are not entirely clear. The ibpAB gene sequences are not similar to those of known E. coli superoxide dismutases or catalase and therefore it is unlikely that IbpAB enzymatically neutralize superoxides and peroxides. MorePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120249 March 23,9 /IbpAB Protect Commensal E. coli against ROSlikely, IbpAB function as intracellular chaperones that bind and sequester or refold proteins that have been damaged by ROS, similar to the mechanisms by which they protect bacterial proteins from heat shock[28]. Indeed, others have shown that recombinant IbpA and IbpB suppress inactivation of E. coli metabolic enzymes by potassium superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in vitro and bind non-native forms of the enzymes[28]. Presumably, similar events occur within the cytoplasm of bacteria exposed to ROS or heat, but this concept remains to be proven. Given that ibpAB protect E. coli proteins from damage by ROS, we hypothesized that E. coli upregulate ibpAB expression in response to ROS. In the present work, we show that ROS induce ibpAB expression in E. coli in lab cultures and macrophage phagolysosomes. Interestingly, while we detected a transient increase in ibpAB expression in E. coli cultures treated with the superoxide generator, paraquat, we did not detect upregulation of ibpAB in E. coli cultures treated with hydrogen peroxide (data not shown). The explanation for this difference is not entirely clear, but could be due to the more reactive and therefore damaging nature of superoxides compared with peroxides. We also hypothesized that RNS, like ROS, might induce ibpAB expression. However, contrary to our hypothesis, we observed increased ibpAB expression in E. coli within Inos-/- macrophages that are deficient in RNS production. This unexpected result could be due to compensatory upregulation of ROS production in Inos-/- macrophages, a phenonmenon that has previously been reported[34]. It is also notable that even in the gp91phox-/macrophages that have impaired ROS production, E. coli ibpAB expression increases over time. Therefore, other factors within macrophages, besides ROS, likely play a role in ibpAB expression. The mechanisms by which ROS cause transcription of ibpAB are unknown. Others have previously shown that the alternative sigma factors 32 and 54 transcribe ibpAB and ibpB, respectively[20]. In addition to heat, other factors have been shown to increase 32 protein levels, including ethanol, hyperosmotic shock, carbon starvation, and alkaline pH. On the other hand, 54 controls expression of several nitrogen-metabolism genes. However, changes in abundance or activity of these alternative sigma factors in response to oxidative stress have not been previously reported. In addition to transcriptional control, IbpAB protein levels are also controlled at the levels of RNA processing, translation, and protein stability. [35,36]. In the present study, we show evidence suggesting that ibpAB expression.
