Lter. Furthermore, Gossypin site particulate matter content inside the flue gas was also measured, for comparison the gas at the gas obtained from combustion of Table 1. Benefits with the measurements in the particulate matter content inwith the flueinlet and at the outlet of filter. non-filtered process gas.Description Test 1 Test 2 Test three Average Notes Inlet–mi , mg/m3 2320 1990 2257 (N) Outcomes of the2460 3. Measurements and Their Evaluation (N) Volumetric flow price of your gas:370 within the 22.four 19.53 The outcomes 17.four measurements of your particulate matter content m3 /h method gas of your 18.eight Temperature of your gas: 380 C upstream and 99.3 Efficiency of particulate matter removal, , downstream from the filter are summarized in Table 1, the outcomes with the meas99.2 98.9 99.1 urements of particulate matter collected in the filter are provided in Table 2, though the results on the measurements on the approach gas composition are presented in Table three and in Table 2. Outcomes in the analysis of particulate matter collected from the tested filter. a graphic form in Figure five. The outcomes of immediately after the Ash Volatile Content Ba 39089 Biological Activity material the particulate matter d Qs d Ccontent in the procedure gas d Hd N before and Sd Sample filtration have already been collected in Table 1. Table two presents the evaluation of particulate matter MJ/kg collected in the ceramic filter, even though Table three presents the outcomes with the particulate matter 18.26 48.65 30.40 74.36 1.04 0.23 0.01 content inside the flue gas with and with out filtering from the approach gas. The composition of your process gas is presented in Table four (average values) and also in Figure 5, which presents gas composition in time. Table 3. Benefits in the measurements of particulate matter content material in flue gas in the installation outlet. Outlet–mo , mg/m3 Sample Sample Table 1. Benefits on the measurements of the particulate matterSample inside the gas in the inlet and at the outlet of filter. content material Average Comments 1 two three Particulate matter in flue gas, mg/m3 Inlet–mi, mg/m3 (N) Particulate matter in flue gas, mg/m3 Outlet–mo, mg/m3 (N)Efficiency of particulate matter removal, , Description Test 1 (N) 2460 (N) 17.four 99.164Test two 2320 142 18.8 130 99.Test three 1990144 22.4121 98.Typical 150 2257 120 19.53 99.Without process gas filtering Filtering of flow price of thegas stream /h Volumetric 20 course of action gas: 370 mTemperature from the gas: 380Notesmg/m3 (N)Filtering of 20 procedure gas streamTable 4. Benefits with the evaluation with the approach gas composition.Energies 2021, 14, 7476 SampleProcess gasCO 17.CO2 14.CH4 6.CnHm 0.H2 five.N2 55.O27 of 11 1.Figure five. Results on the measurements on the course of action gas composition. Figure five. Final results on the measurements of the approach gas composition.As shown in Tableparticulate matter content in the course of action gas beforein theafter the The outcomes of the 1, the typical measured particulate matter content material and course of action gas upstream of thecollected filter is 2257 mg/mpresents thedownstream of the filter is as filtration have already been ceramic in Table 1. Table two three(N), even though analysis of particulate matter collected from the 3(N). The particulate matter removal efficiency was calculated primarily based low as 19.53 mg/mceramic filter, although Table three presents the results with the particulate matter content inside the flue gas around the Formula (1): with and with no filtering of your course of action gas. The composition in the process gas is presented in Table 4 (average values) in addition to in Figure five, which presents ( – 0) gas composition in time. (1) = 100Table four. Resu.